Three conceptions did cross my min...

Three conceptions did cross my mind as I read your editorial (BD&C, 12/03) first, I fix it interesting that a national magazine would appear to oppose the exercise of "free speech" I saw no evidence in your editorial the opposition cedeed anything in the "telephone letter-writing, and e-mail campaign" that was actually incorrect or false Why were they wrong to expres their views, if it were not that you are not wrong to expres your thoughts?
secondary it also seemed disingenuous of you to imply that "conception counseling and HIV testing" were the primary