A southerly Carolina court reaches...

A southerly Carolina court reaches opposite of Oklahoma conclusion

In an example of by what means courts can look at essentially the same facts and proceed to opposite conclusions, a toward the south Carolina court held that an architect did not have a legal what one ought to do to protect the interests of subcontractors who had not been paid by way of the general contractor.

according to contrast, in another case that involved a similar situation, the Oklahoma leading Court ruled that the architect had a legal what one is bound [i]or[/i] under obligation to do to determine that the general contractor had secur a payment link The court commented that the party responsible for