Court haves that shoring design wa...

Court haves that shoring design was not a "means or method" of contracting
A 1990 decision by dint of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held that the design of sheeting and shoring by dint of registered engineers on behalf of a contractor constituted professional services, and was therefore exclud from the contractor's general liability policy (BD&C, March 1991) The [i]clavis[/i] issue was whether the design of sheeting and shoring was a "professional service" or, when performed by means of a contractor, part of the "means and methods" of construction.