In a case likely to draw scrutiny f...

In a case likely to draw scrutiny from proprietors insurance companies and design professionals, a federal district court rul that an proprietor is entitled to coverage when named as an "additional insured" upon an architect's professional liability policy.
The case arose from a suit against the designer and proprietor of a Washington, DC sports arena that alleged a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The umpire found that the law did not apply directly to the architects, further that the owner was liable for failure to provide adequate arrangements for